Response Calvin Magris on abortion: Letter published on UAAR Latest where you can find more details and more news.Dear Magris,
with great sadness I read your article mistakes (1). I am very saddened not only that you wrote that, but above that you think that way.
gives birth to a son only makes sense if this child is wanted, consciously and freely by both parents. If no animal is an act or crime. A human being becomes so not because of the random occurrence of certain biological conditions, but an act of will and love from others. If not, humanity becomes - as in large part already is - a stable of rabbits. But it is no longer the stable 'rural', but on a farm "in battery" in which he lives in conditions of artificial light and artificial food chemicals. Only those who
- man and woman - is one hundred percent convinced of the moral and material have the possibility not only of raising a child but then accept it as a welcome and beloved presence, has the right to procreate, and if not, it has first do everything possible not to conceive and conceive if (as the margin of unpredictability continues to be high) abortion is not only a sad necessity, but a decision highly moral to be taken in full liberty of conscience. I do not understand how you can associate the idea of \u200b\u200bhedonism, abortion or gay life. Abortion is "a" scary thing "...."
in abortion who is murdered, physically and morally, is the woman for a man conscious every abortion is a moral test that leaves its mark, but certainly here the fate of women is disproportionate in these conditions compared to that disfavor man, that every man first to speak of these things has to bite his tongue three times. The moment you try to make it less barbaric situation that is truly frightening for the woman, an intellectual 'uses' his authority because the woman is kept in this hell. Are you a bell'incosciente, to say the least, let me tell you. Do not laugh at much of "hygienic prophylactic measures", sure, you scrape a uterus do not you ever make. But I would like to see if t'obbligassero to be operated in dirt, and no opportunity to use the hospitals, on pain of jail. Your vitality of the 'integrity of life "is at best fatuous. Pasolini tells you that these things, I wonder. You thought you knew what it costs and that is the responsibility of other lives to live (2).
I am sorry that so radical a difference on moral issues is fundamental to interrupt our friendship (3).Paris 3 / 8 febbraio 1975
